LoginRadius vs Auth0
- Authentication
- 2.0
- 5.0
- SSO & Federation
- 1.0
- 4.5
- Authorization
- 0.0
- 4.0
- Lifecycle & Provisioning
- 1.5
- 3.5
- MFA & Passwordless
- 1.5
- 4.5
- Governance & Audit
- 0.5
- 3.5
- Developer Experience
- 1.0
- 5.0
- Deployment Flexibility
- 1.5
- 4.0
- Pricing Transparency
- 2.0
- 2.5
- Support & Ecosystem
- 2.5
- 4.5
Scored 0–5 against a published rubric. Bold marks the higher score. Independent analysis, no vendor sponsorship.
At a glance
For a new or growing build, choose Auth0. It publishes prices, has a free tier up to 25,000 monthly active users, covers OIDC, SAML, OAuth and WebAuthn with mature SDKs, and handles both B2C and B2B. LoginRadius still makes sense for a marketing-led CIAM deployment that is already live and working, where the cost of migrating outweighs the gap. Most people asking this question are deciding whether to leave LoginRadius, and for developer-led teams the answer is usually yes.
Where each wins
| Decision factor | LoginRadius | Auth0 |
|---|---|---|
| Who runs it | Marketing-led, low-code teams | Engineering-led teams |
| Public pricing | None; sales quote after a 14-day trial | Published starting prices, free tier |
| Developer experience | Dated SDKs, per community feedback | Quickstarts across major frameworks, Actions extensibility |
| B2B organizations and enterprise SSO | Federated SSO connections as an Enterprise add-on | Organizations and enterprise connections on B2B plans |
| Consent and profile management | Core strength, though consent management is a priced add-on | Possible, but not the product's centre |
| Private deployment | Single-tenant private cloud add-on | Private Cloud on AWS or Azure, run by Auth0 |
Pricing reality (checked 2026-11-05)
Auth0's pricing page lists Free up to 25,000 MAUs, then Essentials from 35 dollars a month (B2C) or 150 (B2B), Professional from 240 or 800, both quoted at 500 MAUs, and Enterprise on quote. Annual billing is 11 times the monthly price. B2B Essentials includes 3 enterprise connections and Professional 5, with extra connections at 100 dollars a month each up to 30. Log retention runs from 1 day on Free to 30 days on Enterprise. Starting prices climb with MAU, so the bill grows with scale, and that is the recurring Auth0 complaint.
LoginRadius's pricing page shows Professional and Enterprise with no prices. It describes consumption-based pricing by MAU and a 14-day trial, with no free tier. Professional includes OTP MFA, passkeys, SAML, OIDC and JWT federation, one custom domain and a 50 requests-per-second core API limit. Adaptive MFA, federated SSO connections, fine-grained access controls, a HIPAA BAA, private cloud, consent management and 30-day audit retention are all priced add-ons. Get every add-on into the written quote, then compare both in the TCO calculator.
Ownership
Okta announced its acquisition of Auth0 on 3 March 2021 and closed it on 3 May 2021, in a stock deal valued at about 6.5 billion dollars. Auth0 is still sold as a separate developer product from Okta's workforce platform. If Okta's past support-system incidents, such as the 2023 help desk session token theft, worry your reviewers, harden your tenant and review its admin access. LoginRadius, founded in 2012 in Jaipur, is privately held.
Deployment and architecture
Both are managed services. Auth0 runs multi-tenant SaaS or Private Cloud, which is single-tenant and isolated but operated by Auth0 on AWS or Azure. You cannot self-host it. LoginRadius offers SaaS plus a single-tenant private cloud add-on, and its Enterprise tier lists choice of deployment model and multi-country deployment. Auth0's extensibility runs through Actions, which are code hooks in the login pipeline. LoginRadius leans on hosted, configurable registration and profile pages.
Migration notes
Going from LoginRadius to Auth0, Auth0 bulk imports take user JSON in files of up to 500KB each, so large stores need many jobs. Users keep their passwords only if the source hash algorithm is one Auth0 supports. Everyone else resets at first login. Confirm LoginRadius's export format and hash algorithm before you promise a no-reset cutover. Rebuild social connections, consent records and branded pages by hand, and run both systems in parallel until login success rates match.
Who should pick which
- Stay on LoginRadius: marketing owns identity, the deployment is stable, consent and profile management are the main requirements, and no engineering roadmap depends on identity.
- Choose Auth0: developers own login, you need B2B organizations alongside B2C, you want passkeys and published prices, and you can live with per-MAU costs.
- Look elsewhere: for self-hosting or flat pricing, see FusionAuth and Keycloak. For the wider field, see how to choose a CIAM platform and the best CIAM platforms.
Frequently asked questions
- Is LoginRadius cheaper than Auth0?
- There is no way to tell from public information. LoginRadius publishes no prices: both its Professional and Enterprise plans route to sales, the model is consumption-based by monthly active user, and there is a 14-day trial rather than a free tier. Auth0 publishes starting prices: Free up to 25,000 MAUs, Essentials from 35 dollars a month for B2C or 150 for B2B, Professional from 240 or 800, and Enterprise on quote. Get a written LoginRadius quote at your real MAU and compare it with Auth0 list price plus the add-ons you need. Prices checked 2026-11-05.
- Does LoginRadius support passkeys?
- Its pricing page lists passkeys in the Professional plan's feature list. Our LoginRadius profile treats passkeys and modern passwordless as weak spots relative to the developer-first platforms, so test the passkey enrolment and recovery flows in the trial rather than relying on the checkbox.
- Who owns Auth0?
- Okta. Okta announced the acquisition on 3 March 2021 and closed it on 3 May 2021, in a stock transaction its filing valued at about 6.5 billion dollars. Auth0 remains a separate developer-facing customer identity product alongside Okta's workforce platform. LoginRadius is privately held.
- How do I migrate users from LoginRadius to Auth0?
- Auth0 supports bulk user imports through a Management API job, with a 500KB limit per import file, so large user stores are split across many jobs. Users whose passwords were hashed with an algorithm Auth0 supports can keep their passwords; anyone else has to reset at first login. Confirm which hash algorithm your LoginRadius export uses before you commit to a no-reset cutover, and plan to rebuild social connections, consent records and branded login pages.
Related on Start with Identity
- CVEAuth0 node-jws HS256 verification bypass via secret lookup
node-jws before 3.2.3 / 4.0.1 can accept an HS256 JWT when the caller looks up the secret from attacker-controlled input. Medium on paper, but it is a signature
- ComparisonAuth0 vs Stytch: 2026 Pricing, Owners, Verdict
Auth0 vs Stytch in 2026: Okta's full CIAM platform against Twilio's API-first passwordless toolkit, with free tiers of 25,000 vs 10,000 MAU and migration notes.
- Comparisonauth0-vs-clerk
Auth0 is the general-purpose CIAM platform with the widest protocol coverage and enterprise credibility. Clerk is the fastest path to a polished login in a Reac
- Comparisonauth0-vs-descope
Auth0 is the breadth and track-record option for customer identity. Descope turns login into a visual flow non-engineers can change. Passkey depth is where Desc
- ArticleWorkOS vs SSOJet vs Auth0: Which Fits Your B2B SaaS in 2026
The three names B2B SaaS buyers shortlist together for enterprise SSO: WorkOS, SSOJet, and Auth0, compared on architecture, pricing at scale, and which one fits
- ArticleB2B vs B2C CIAM: Tenancy, Organizations, and Architecture
B2B and B2C customer identity share a name but differ in architecture. This guide explains the organization and tenancy model, who administers users, and why ch
Last updated 2026-11-05
Independent, community-driven analysis. No vendor sponsorship. Compiled from public research and community input and verified on a best-effort basis, so details may be incomplete or out of date. Scores are opinions, not advice. Trademarks belong to their owners; mention does not imply affiliation or endorsement. See the full disclaimer, or send corrections to community@startwithidentity.com.