Start with Identity
Identity CVE · SAML

CVE-2024-8698Keycloak SAML signature validation bypass

high
Product: KeycloakVendor: Red HatCWE-347Disclosed: 2024-09-19Status: PatchedProtocol deep diveNVD ↗

What broke

Keycloak's XMLSignatureUtil SAML signature check returned the wrong answer. A crafted response could bypass validation, impersonate a user, and escalate privilege in any realm that accepted SAML. Red Hat rated it high and patched in September 2024 (RHSA train around RHSA-2024 and the Keycloak 25.x / 24.x fixes).

Why it matters

Keycloak is the default on-prem IdP for a lot of Kubernetes and Red Hat estates. A SAML verifier bug there is every federated app, not one SP. 2024 was the year ruby-saml, GHES, samlify, and Keycloak all failed the same signature-binding test.

What to do

  • Upgrade Keycloak off the September 2024 advisory. Confirm the running image, not the Helm chart default.
  • If the realm used SAML while unpatched, review first-time NameIDs and new realm-admin role mappings.
  • Pair with the 2025 Keycloak set (First Broker Login, password-reset AD skip) so you do not patch SAML and leave the other identity holes.

After you patch

A SAML bypass means the service provider accepted an assertion it should have rejected, so anyone who exploited it authenticated as a real user and left a normal-looking log line.

  • Revoke every session issued by the affected service provider, then rotate its session signing keys. Patching stops new forgeries and does nothing about sessions already minted.
  • Audit administrative accounts and group memberships for changes during the exposure window. Signing in as an administrator is the point of this class, and adding a second account is the standard persistence step.
  • Rotate the identity provider signing certificate if the flaw involved signature validation, and confirm the service provider pins the expected certificate rather than trusting anything in the assertion.
  • Check your own implementation for the same class: exact-match comparison on verification results, rejection of unexpected signature algorithms, and audience and recency checks on every assertion. See SAML 2.0 and SAML vs OIDC.

Sources

Last reviewed By SWI Community TeamSuggest a correctionHow we research

Technique

This CVE is an instance of Federation trust abuse and SAML forgery. A service provider that accepts a SAML assertion it should have rejected treats a forged identity as authenticated, because the failure sits in signature validation code, not in cryptography.

Know a primary source we should add, or a patch status that has changed? Email community@startwithidentity.com. See all briefs in the identity CVE catalog, or volunteer as a CVE Analyst.
Compiled from vendor advisories, NVD, CISA KEV, and public research. CVSS figures can disagree across NVD and the CNA. Confirm affected versions against the vendor advisory before you patch. Independent, community-driven analysis. See the disclaimer.