Start with Identity
Identity CVE · OAuth / OIDC / JWT

CVE-2025-27371OAuth 2.0 private_key_jwt audience ambiguity

high
Product: OAuth 2.0 specification (JWT profile)Vendor: IETF / OpenID FoundationDisclosed: 2025-03-01Status: Spec-level fixProtocol deep diveNVD ↗

What broke

The OpenID Foundation disclosed that the OAuth 2.0 JWT client-authentication profile (private_key_jwt) leaves the audience value underspecified. A client assertion minted for authorization server A can be accepted by authorization server B if both share a view of the client's key and neither pins aud tightly. CVE-2025-27371 is the OAuth-spec ID. CVE-2025-27370 is the OpenID twin.

There is no single vendor patch. The fix is in the spec text and in how implementations validate aud.

Why it matters

private_key_jwt is the "grown-up" client authentication. Banks, FAPI deployments, and high-assurance CIAM stacks use it specifically to avoid shared secrets. An audience mix-up turns that strength into a confused-deputy: a JWT meant for one environment or tenant is a valid login somewhere else.

What to do

  • Pin aud to the exact authorization-server identifier (issuer or token-endpoint URL) your implementation now documents. Reject arrays that include extra values.
  • Separate client keys per environment and per tenant. Shared keys make the spec ambiguity exploitable.
  • Track the OpenID Foundation and IETF errata. This is a spec-level CVE, so library defaults will lag.

After you patch

Token-layer flaws produce credentials that keep working after the patch, so remediation is about invalidating what was issued.

  • Rotate the signing keys published at your JWKS endpoint, then confirm relying parties refetch on an unknown key id rather than caching indefinitely.
  • Revoke refresh tokens and sessions. Access tokens expire on their own; refresh tokens are the ones that turn a short compromise into months of access.
  • Audit client registrations and consent grants created during the window, particularly any client with broad scopes or a redirect URI you do not recognize.
  • Verify validation on your side: pinned algorithms, issuer and audience checks, and no acceptance of alg: none. See JWT and the validate a JWT recipe.

Sources

Last reviewed By SWI Community TeamSuggest a correctionHow we research

Technique

This CVE is an instance of Token replay against an unbound endpoint. A token that is not bound to the client, session, or challenge that requested it can be lifted once and replayed anywhere the check for binding is missing, no matter how it was strengthened.

Know a primary source we should add, or a patch status that has changed? Email community@startwithidentity.com. See all briefs in the identity CVE catalog, or volunteer as a CVE Analyst.
Compiled from vendor advisories, NVD, CISA KEV, and public research. CVSS figures can disagree across NVD and the CNA. Confirm affected versions against the vendor advisory before you patch. Independent, community-driven analysis. See the disclaimer.