Start with Identity
Identity CVE · Other

CVE-2025-59280Windows SMB Client improper authentication (tampering)

high
Product: Windows SMB ClientVendor: MicrosoftCWE-287Disclosed: 2025-10-14Status: PatchedNVD ↗

What broke

The Windows SMB Client failed to authenticate a response the way it should (CWE-287, improper authentication). An attacker who can tamper with the exchange can modify what the client believes. Microsoft patched it.

Why it matters

SMB is how Windows still moves files and, too often, how it authenticates to file servers with the user's Kerberos ticket. Improper authentication on the client is how a network attacker becomes a participant in that identity. Read it next to the SMB/Kerberos reflection pair (CVE-2025-33073, CVE-2025-58726).

What to do

  • Deploy the named Windows update on clients, not only on servers.
  • Prefer SMB signing and encryption. A tampering bug is much less useful when the channel is bound.
  • Watch for unexpected SMB referrals off your file-server namespace.

After you patch

Patching closes the entry point. It does not remove access an attacker established through it.

  • Revoke sessions and API tokens on the affected system rather than only resetting passwords.
  • Audit accounts, tokens, and administrative changes made during the exposure window.
  • Rotate credentials the system stored or could reach, including directory service accounts and integration keys. See secrets rotation.
  • Treat the system as a pivot: whatever it could authenticate to is in scope until you have checked it.

Sources

Last reviewed By SWI Community TeamSuggest a correctionHow we research
Know a primary source we should add, or a patch status that has changed? Email community@startwithidentity.com. See all briefs in the identity CVE catalog, or volunteer as a CVE Analyst.
Compiled from vendor advisories, NVD, CISA KEV, and public research. CVSS figures can disagree across NVD and the CNA. Confirm affected versions against the vendor advisory before you patch. Independent, community-driven analysis. See the disclaimer.