AuthZed
Capability scores
Methodology →- Authentication
- 2.0
- SSO & Federation
- 2.0
- Authorization
- 5.0
- Lifecycle & Provisioning
- 2.5
- MFA & Passwordless
- 1.5
- Governance & Audit
- 3.5
- Developer Experience
- 4.5
- Deployment Flexibility
- 4.5
- Pricing Transparency
- 3.5
- Support & Ecosystem
- 3.0
Scored 0–5 against a published rubric. Independent analysis, no vendor sponsorship.
Overview
AuthZed is the company behind SpiceDB, the open-source authorization database modelled on Google's Zanzibar paper, and in 2026 it is a privately held, Series A-funded specialist selling managed, dedicated and self-hosted enterprise versions of it. SpiceDB is a relationship-based access control engine: permissions are a graph of relationships between subjects and objects, and checks traverse that graph. Founded in 2020, AuthZed raised a 12 million dollar Series A led by General Catalyst in June 2024, bringing total funding to 15.9 million dollars, with Canva and Turo as named customers.
SpiceDB is Apache 2.0 and has stayed that way, with about 7,200 GitHub stars and a current release of v1.57.0 from 20 October 2026.
What it is good at
Zanzibar fidelity and operational maturity. SpiceDB models nested ownership, sharing, groups and hierarchies that flat RBAC cannot express, and its consistency controls are the strongest argument for it: ZedToken is the documented equivalent of Zanzibar's Zookie, with four per-request consistency modes from minimize_latency through fully_consistent, explicitly addressing the New Enemy Problem where stale permission data leaks access. OpenFGA offers a coarser opt-in consistency flag by comparison.
Pricing structure is a quiet advantage. AuthZed meters on compute capacity, by vCPU and region, rather than per relationship or per check, so storing more permission facts does not itself increase cost. AuthZed Cloud starts at 2 dollars per hour, pay-as-you-go with no up-front commitment, and in June 2026 AuthZed offered YC companies 50 percent off Cloud usage for two years.
Materialize reached general availability on 10 September 2026 on the Dedicated tier, precomputing transitive relationships for deeply nested graphs where live traversal is too slow.
Where it falls short
Four capabilities are reserved to SpiceDB Enterprise: restricted API access, audit logging, rate limiting and Security Embargo. That last one means open-source users receive vulnerability detail only at public disclosure while paying customers get advance notice, which is a real consideration for self-hosters.
Funding is over two years stale with no announced Series B, and no customer count is published beyond two named logos.
The security advisory record is honest but non-trivial: CVE-2026-55866, a cache-key flaw that could return a full permission where a conditional result was correct, plus datastore secrets exposed in startup logs (CVE-2026-40091) and, in September 2026, in traces (fixed in 1.56.2). None is in CISA KEV.
It does nothing for authentication, SSO or MFA, and relationship modelling has a real learning curve.
Pricing
Free tier: open-source SpiceDB, self-hosted under Apache 2.0. AuthZed Cloud from $2 per hour, usage-based (pricing page, checked 2026-11-05). Dedicated is priced on reserved vCPU and self-hosted enterprise on an annual licence per region and per vCPU; both are quote-based. Model it with our TCO calculator.
Best for, and who should look elsewhere
Choose AuthZed when sharing, nesting and hierarchy dominate your permission model and you need consistency guarantees. Choose OpenFGA for CNCF governance, Oso for a unified model with SQL filtering, or Cerbos for stateless policy decisions. See AuthZed vs OpenFGA, OpenFGA vs AuthZed vs Cerbos and RBAC vs ABAC vs ReBAC.
Bottom line
The most faithful open-source Zanzibar implementation available, with capacity-based pricing that does not punish scale, provided you can live with Enterprise-gated audit logging and embargoed security disclosures.
AuthZed: frequently asked questions
- How much does AuthZed cost?
- SpiceDB is free to self-host under Apache 2.0. AuthZed Cloud, the managed service, advertises deploying a permissions system for 2 dollars per hour with usage-based billing and standard support included; it is pay-as-you-go with no up-front commitment. AuthZed Dedicated is priced on reserved vCPU capacity after a consultation, and self-hosted enterprise SpiceDB is an annual licence per region and per vCPU, both without published rates. AuthZed prices on compute, not on relationships, checks or monthly active users (checked 2026-11-05).
- Is SpiceDB open source and has the licence changed?
- SpiceDB is Apache 2.0 and remains so. There has been no relicensing event, no move to BUSL or SSPL, which is worth stating plainly given how many infrastructure projects have changed terms since 2023. The repository carries about 7,200 GitHub stars as of November 2026. SpiceDB Enterprise is a separate commercially licensed build of the same engine rather than a fork, and AuthZed runs it in its own managed services.
- What do you lose by running open-source SpiceDB instead of Enterprise?
- Four documented capabilities. Restricted API Access scopes which calls each service account may make. Audit Logging emits full request and response detail per API operation to a log sink. Rate Limiting applies distributed limits by endpoint, service account, header or CEL expression, currently marked tech preview. And Security Embargo gives private advance notice of vulnerabilities, with fixes and remediation time before public disclosure. That last one has a real consequence worth weighing: open-source users learn about SpiceDB vulnerabilities at public disclosure, paying customers learn earlier.
- Is SpiceDB a true Zanzibar implementation?
- It is the closest of the open-source options. SpiceDB implements token-based point-in-time consistency through ZedToken, which its documentation explicitly identifies as the equivalent of Zanzibar's Zookie, and names the New Enemy Problem it exists to prevent. Four consistency modes are exposed per request: minimize_latency, at_least_as_fresh, at_exact_snapshot and fully_consistent. OpenFGA offers an opt-in higher-consistency flag rather than token-based point-in-time consistency. If faithfulness to the Zanzibar paper matters to your design, SpiceDB is the stronger claim.
- What is AuthZed Materialize?
- Materialize precomputes transitive relationships across the authorization graph, periodically recomputing its view from a snapshot and consuming a live stream of relationship changes in between. It reached general availability on 10 September 2026 for AuthZed Dedicated only, after entering early access in February 2024. AuthZed states single-digit millisecond responses over billions of relationships in production since 2024. Event Streams remains early access; Accelerated Queries is the part that went GA. This is the answer to deeply nested permission graphs where live traversal becomes the bottleneck.
- Does SpiceDB have known vulnerabilities?
- Several, all patched and none in CISA KEV; the pattern is authorization-logic and log-hygiene bugs rather than remote code execution. CVE-2026-55866 (CVSS 3.7, NVD 14 September 2026) let cached dispatch checks return a full permission where a conditional result was correct; fixed in 1.54.0. CVE-2026-46668 (nested caveat cache reuse, fixed 1.52.0) and CVE-2026-40091 (CVSS 6.0, datastore connection string with password in startup logs, fixed 1.51.1) came earlier in 2026. The latest advisory, GHSA-jf7w-wx43-32gc on 11 September 2026, found traces exposing datastore secrets in 1.54.0 to 1.56.1, fixed in 1.56.2.
- What should I check in an AuthZed fine-grained authorization evaluation?
- Model your hardest real case in the SpiceDB schema language first: nested folders, group-of-groups sharing, or tenant hierarchies. Then test which consistency mode each call needs, because using fully_consistent everywhere costs latency while minimize_latency risks the New Enemy Problem. Decide early whether you need audit logging, restricted API access or rate limiting, since those are Enterprise-only, and how you will keep relationships in sync with your application database. Finally, check whether Materialize, available only on Dedicated, is needed for deep graphs.
- How well funded is AuthZed?
- Its last disclosed round was a 12 million dollar Series A announced 27 June 2024, led by General Catalyst with Work-Bench, Y Combinator and Amplify Partners, bringing total raised to 15.9 million dollars. Canva and Turo were named as customers. No funding has been announced since, as of November 2026, so that figure is more than two years old. At the time SpiceDB had more than 4,500 GitHub stars; it has about 7,200 now. AuthZed remains a private company.
- What are the best AuthZed alternatives?
- OpenFGA, which reached CNCF Incubating maturity in October 2025, if vendor-neutral foundation governance matters more than Zanzibar fidelity. Oso if you want one model spanning roles, relationships and attributes with SQL-level data filtering rather than a relationship database. Cerbos if stateless policy decisions without a central relationship store fit better. Permit.io for a more managed, product-led experience. Stay with SpiceDB when sharing, nesting and hierarchy dominate your permission model and consistency guarantees matter.
AuthZed comparisons
More Authorization vendors
All Authorization →- Styra / Open Policy Agent4.3/5
- OpenFGA4.2/5
- AWS Verified Permissions4.1/5
- Warrant (now WorkOS FGA)4.1/5
- Cerbos4/5
Related on Start with Identity
- VendorAserto
strong
- VendorAWS Verified Permissions
strong_contender
- GuideFrom RBAC to ReBAC: when and how to migrate
Migrate from RBAC to ReBAC when access depends on *which object* a user is related to, not just *what role* they hold. If you are creating roles like `editor_fo
- GuideImplementing Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC): A Practical Guide
Design and deploy attribute-based access control with policy engines, XACML, dynamic authorization, and practical guidance on when ABAC beats RBAC.
- GuideImplementing RBAC in the Enterprise
A hands-on guide to implementing Role-Based Access Control in the enterprise, covering role modeling, role mining, role hierarchy design, RBAC vs ABAC considera
- Comparisonopenfga-vs-cerbos
OpenFGA models permissions as a relationship graph in the Zanzibar style and stores the tuples. Cerbos evaluates policy-as-code statelessly against attributes y
By SWI Community Team · Last evaluated 2026-11-05
Independent, community-driven analysis. No vendor sponsorship. Compiled from public research and community input and verified on a best-effort basis, so details may be incomplete or out of date. Scores are opinions, not advice. Trademarks belong to their owners; mention does not imply affiliation or endorsement. See the full disclaimer, or send corrections to community@startwithidentity.com.