Which IGA platforms are SOC 2, ISO 27001, and FedRAMP compliant?

SailPoint and Saviynt list SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001:2022 and hold FedRAMP Moderate authorization; neither is FedRAMP High today. Omada states ISO 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type 2. One Identity and RSA Governance & Lifecycle have no FedRAMP listing of their own. Confirm the current, exact certifications and authorization scope directly with each vendor, since these change.

How does IGA support compliance?

IGA produces the core evidence auditors want for access: who approved access, periodic access certifications, separation-of-duties enforcement, and provisioning and deprovisioning trails. That maps directly to SOC 2, ISO 27001, SOX, and ITGC requirements, which is why governance is central to audit readiness.

Does an IGA vendor's certification make me compliant?

No. The vendor's SOC 2 or FedRAMP authorization covers their service, not your access-governance program. It reduces due diligence and supports your audits, but you remain responsible for running certifications, enforcing separation of duties, and evidencing your controls.

What is the difference between IGA and PAM for compliance?

IGA governs who should have access and certifies it across all users and applications; PAM controls and monitors privileged access specifically. Auditors expect both. Mature programs connect them so privileged entitlements are included in access certifications. See our fundamentals guides on IGA and PAM.

Ranking · segment · 7 min

Compliant IGA Platforms: SOC 2, ISO 27001:2022 & FedRAMP

Identity governance platforms that produce the evidence auditors require.

By SWI Community Team · Updated 2026-10-16Scored on our 10-dimension rubric

Identity governance is where audit evidence comes from. Access certifications, separation-of-duties controls and provisioning trails are what SOC 2, ISO 27001, SOX and ITGC auditors ask to see, so two things matter: whether the platform produces that evidence well, and whether the vendor itself holds the attestations your own security review will request. This page ranks on the second, using what each vendor's trust page or the FedRAMP Marketplace actually lists. For capability-led selection, see best IGA tools.

How to read an IGA vendor's compliance claims

SaaS versus self-hosted. Attestations cover the vendor's cloud service. A self-hosted deployment of the same product carries no vendor attestation; the evidence is yours to produce.

FedRAMP level and package. Moderate and High are different authorisations, and "in process" is not authorised. Check the exact service offering on the FedRAMP Marketplace.

Version currency. Product certifications such as Common Criteria apply to a specific version and lapse.

Applied to this category

SailPoint's trust page lists ISO 27001:2022, 27017 and 27018, SOC 3, IRAP and a SOC 2 report available under NDA, and Identity Security Cloud has been FedRAMP Moderate authorised since June 2024. Saviynt lists ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27017, SOC 1 and SOC 2 Type II, PCI DSS and an IRAP assessment at PROTECTED; its Enterprise Identity Cloud has been FedRAMP Moderate since March 2019, while a separate High package has been in process since August 2026, so it is not High authorised today. Omada states ISO 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type 2 for Identity Cloud, with a public SOC 3 report; we found no FedRAMP Marketplace listing for it.

One Identity's Common Criteria certification is for Identity Manager 8.1 from 2020, while the shipping line is 9.x, and the company announced in June 2026 that it will separate from Quest, so confirm current attestations and the contracting entity. RSA Governance & Lifecycle is strongest in on-premises and air-gapped public-sector deployments; RSA's FedRAMP listing is for ID Plus for Government, not the governance product.

Quick picker by scenario

Large regulated programme, FedRAMP Moderate cloud: SailPoint.
Cross-cloud entitlements, FedRAMP Moderate, watching for High: Saviynt.
European enterprise, faster rollout, EU data residency: Omada.
Joined-up IGA and PAM evidence: One Identity, with the separation on your risk register.
Air-gapped or existing RSA estate: RSA Governance & Lifecycle.

Where to go next

Read what is IGA, the identity governance programme guide and the IAM audit preparation guide. For frameworks, see SOC 2 and ISO 27001. For head-to-heads, see SailPoint vs Saviynt and Omada vs Saviynt, and for the wider field, top identity governance platforms.

SailPoint4.7/5 overall

The governance leader, with deep certification and FedRAMP-authorized cloud.

SailPoint lists ISO 27001:2022 and a SOC 2 report available under NDA, and Identity Security Cloud is FedRAMP Moderate authorized, and its automated access certifications and separation-of-duties controls generate exactly the evidence SOC 2, ISO 27001, and SOX auditors ask for. The default for large regulated programs.

Best for: Large regulated enterprises and government needing deep, well-attested governance

Watch out: Enterprise commitment in cost and implementation

Read the full SailPoint review →

Saviynt4.5/5 overall

Cloud-native governance with strong compliance and cross-cloud entitlement coverage.

Saviynt lists SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001:2022 and holds FedRAMP Moderate authorization, with a High package still in process, with intelligence-driven access reviews and application access governance that map cleanly to audit requirements across cloud and on-premises.

Best for: Enterprises governing cross-cloud entitlements under heavy audit scrutiny

Watch out: Breadth means scoping the modules you deploy and certify

Read the full Saviynt review →

Omada4.3/5 overall

Standards-based governance with a fast, audit-friendly implementation model.

Omada states ISO 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type 2 for Identity Cloud, and its best-practice, configurable framework helps organizations stand up compliant access reviews and provisioning quickly, which suits Microsoft-centric and mid-to-large regulated enterprises.

Best for: Regulated enterprises wanting compliant governance with faster time-to-value

Watch out: Very large, highly custom estates may need deeper platform depth

Read the full Omada review →

One Identity4.2/5 overall

Governance that unifies with PAM for cleaner, joined-up audit evidence.

One Identity Manager pairs with Safeguard for privileged access, so governance and privileged entitlements are certified together, producing joined-up evidence for SOC 2, ISO 27001, and SOX.

Best for: Enterprises unifying IGA and PAM to streamline audits

Watch out: Separation from Quest announced June 2026; confirm the contracting entity

Read the full One Identity review →

RSA Governance & Lifecycle4.1/5 overall

Established governance with a strong compliance and risk heritage.

RSA brings a long compliance and risk pedigree, with mature access certification and role management that regulated enterprises rely on for audit readiness, particularly in finance and government.

Best for: Regulated enterprises that value a long-established governance and risk platform

Watch out: Modernization varies by deployment; validate the current cloud posture

Read the full RSA Governance & Lifecycle review →

At a glance

#	Vendor	Score	Best for
1	SailPoint	4.7/5	Large regulated enterprises and government needing deep, well-attested governance
2	Saviynt	4.5/5	Enterprises governing cross-cloud entitlements under heavy audit scrutiny
3	Omada	4.3/5	Regulated enterprises wanting compliant governance with faster time-to-value
4	One Identity	4.2/5	Enterprises unifying IGA and PAM to streamline audits
5	RSA Governance & Lifecycle	4.1/5	Regulated enterprises that value a long-established governance and risk platform

Frequently asked questions

Which IGA platforms are SOC 2, ISO 27001, and FedRAMP compliant?: SailPoint and Saviynt list SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001:2022 and hold FedRAMP Moderate authorization; neither is FedRAMP High today. Omada states ISO 27001:2022 and SOC 2 Type 2. One Identity and RSA Governance & Lifecycle have no FedRAMP listing of their own. Confirm the current, exact certifications and authorization scope directly with each vendor, since these change.
How does IGA support compliance?: IGA produces the core evidence auditors want for access: who approved access, periodic access certifications, separation-of-duties enforcement, and provisioning and deprovisioning trails. That maps directly to SOC 2, ISO 27001, SOX, and ITGC requirements, which is why governance is central to audit readiness.
Does an IGA vendor's certification make me compliant?: No. The vendor's SOC 2 or FedRAMP authorization covers their service, not your access-governance program. It reduces due diligence and supports your audits, but you remain responsible for running certifications, enforcing separation of duties, and evidencing your controls.
What is the difference between IGA and PAM for compliance?: IGA governs who should have access and certifies it across all users and applications; PAM controls and monitors privileged access specifically. Auditors expect both. Mature programs connect them so privileged entitlements are included in access certifications. See our fundamentals guides on IGA and PAM.

Last reviewed October 16, 2026By SWI Community TeamSuggest a correction How we research

Independent and community-driven, no sponsorship. Rankings reflect ourcapability rubricand editorial judgment. See the fullrankings indexand head-to-head comparisons.