Twingate
Capability scores
Methodology →- Authentication
- 3.5
- SSO & Federation
- 4.0
- Authorization
- 4.0
- Lifecycle & Provisioning
- 3.0
- MFA & Passwordless
- 3.5
- Governance & Audit
- 3.5
- Developer Experience
- 3.5
- Deployment Flexibility
- 4.0
- Pricing Transparency
- 4.5
- Support & Ecosystem
- 4.0
Scored 0–5 against a published rubric. Independent analysis, no vendor sponsorship.
Overview
Twingate is a zero trust network access (ZTNA) product that replaces the corporate VPN with per-resource, identity-checked access to private apps, servers, and networks. Founded in 2019 and based in Redwood City, California, it is privately held and venture-backed; its most recent publicly reported round was a 42 million dollar Series B in 2022. It sells to everyone from five-person startups (free tier) to enterprises, and its design goal is speed of rollout rather than breadth of features.
The architecture, documented in How Twingate Works, has four parts. A SaaS Controller holds configuration and delegates sign-in to your identity provider. Connectors run inside each private network and only make outbound connections. Relays broker connectivity when a direct path is not possible. The Client on each device proxies DNS and TCP/UDP traffic for protected resources only, so everything else stays on the local internet path (split tunneling by default).
What they are good at
Deployment effort is the standout: a Connector is a container or small Linux package, there are no inbound firewall rules to open, and existing VPN can run in parallel while you move resources over. Identity integration covers Google Workspace on Teams and Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, and JumpCloud with SCIM provisioning on Business. Device posture checks can use native signals or EDR and MDM integrations (CrowdStrike, Intune, Jamf, Kandji, SentinelOne). Infrastructure teams get a Terraform provider and a Kubernetes operator, so access can be managed as code. Business adds just-in-time and usage-based access policies, and Enterprise adds privileged access for SSH, Kubernetes, and databases.
Where they fall short
Twingate is ZTNA, not SASE. There is no SD-WAN, no full secure web gateway, no CASB and no DLP; DNS filtering is a paid add-on. The Controller is SaaS-only, so organizations that must run the control plane on their own infrastructure or fully air-gapped should look at Appgate. Access is client-based: Twingate's own docs describe browser controls that still rely on the installed Client, so unmanaged contractor devices are harder to cover than with clientless products. Admin roles and audit log retention are tied to plan tier, which matters for compliance teams on the cheaper plans.
Pricing
Transparent. Starter is free for 5 users; Teams is listed at 5 dollars and Business at 10 dollars per user per month, with a 15 percent annual discount; Enterprise is quoted (pricing page, read 2026-10-31). That puts it among the more open vendors in the Identity Pricing Transparency Index.
Best for, and who should look elsewhere
Choose Twingate if the goal is retiring a VPN quickly for a remote or hybrid workforce and you already run a modern IdP. If you want device-to-device mesh networking, compare Tailscale (see Tailscale vs Cloudflare). If you need full SSE or SASE, look at Cato Networks, Zscaler, or Cloudflare. The zero trust rollout guide and the best zero trust tools ranking cover the wider field.
Bottom line
Twingate is the fastest credible way for a small or mid-sized organization to replace a VPN with identity-based access: plan for days, not months, of rollout. It stops at private access, so buyers who also need web security or SD-WAN will be adding a second vendor.
Twingate: frequently asked questions
- How much does Twingate cost?
- Twingate publishes its prices. Starter is free for up to 5 users. Teams is listed at 5 dollars per user per month and Business at 10 dollars per user per month, with a 15 percent discount for annual billing, and Teams caps at 100 users and Business at 500. A non-commercial Home plan is 15 dollars per month flat for up to 7 users. Enterprise is custom-quoted. Prices were read from twingate.com/pricing on 2026-10-31.
- Does Twingate need inbound firewall ports?
- No inbound ports are opened for the Connector. The Connector runs inside your network and keeps outbound connections to Twingate Relays and the Controller. The Client tries a direct peer-to-peer connection to the Connector first and falls back to a Relay, and traffic runs in a TLS tunnel pinned to the specific Connector.
- Is Twingate a full SASE platform?
- No. Twingate is a focused ZTNA product with DNS filtering as an add-on. It does not provide SD-WAN, a full secure web gateway, CASB, or DLP. Teams that want all of those from one vendor should look at Cato Networks, Zscaler, Netskope, or Cloudflare.
- Twingate or Tailscale?
- Both replace VPNs without exposing inbound ports. Twingate is resource-centric: admins define individual resources and policies, and the Connector sits at a network edge. Tailscale is a WireGuard-based device mesh where every node can talk to every other node subject to ACLs. Twingate usually fits IT-managed access to private apps; Tailscale fits engineering teams wanting device-to-device networking.
More Zero Trust vendors
All Zero Trust →- Cloudflare Zero Trust4.6/5
- Tailscale4.5/5
- Zscaler4.5/5
- Cato Networks4.4/5
- Netskope4.3/5
Related on Start with Identity
- CVESMB Server Kerberos reflection via Ghost SPNs
October 2025 follow-on to CVE-2025-33073. SMB Server elevation of privilege by combining Kerberos reflection with Ghost SPNs and DNS self-registration.
- CVEWindows SMB Client improper authentication (tampering)
Windows SMB Client improper authentication (CWE-287) that allows tampering. Not an Entra token bug, but it sits in the same Microsoft identity-adjacent patch tr
- CVEWindows SMB Kerberos reflection elevation of privilege
Kerberos authentication reflection on SMB, still abusable via Ghost SPNs after the first fix. High-severity elevation of privilege on Windows.
- VendorBanyan Security (now SonicWall Cloud Secure Edge)
strong_contender
- VendorCisco Secure Access
strong_contender
- Comparisoncloudflare-vs-zscaler
Cloudflare delivers zero trust access at a fraction of incumbent pricing with a published price list. Zscaler is the mature enterprise SASE platform for large,
By SWI Community Team · Last evaluated 2026-10-31
Independent, community-driven analysis. No vendor sponsorship. Compiled from public research and community input and verified on a best-effort basis, so details may be incomplete or out of date. Scores are opinions, not advice. Trademarks belong to their owners; mention does not imply affiliation or endorsement. See the full disclaimer, or send corrections to community@startwithidentity.com.