What Is Decentralized Identity?
Decentralized identity is a model where individuals and organizations hold their own verifiable credentials in a digital wallet and present them directly to whoever needs to check them, without a central identity provider brokering every interaction. It is often called self-sovereign identity (SSI) because the holder, not a platform, controls the credential.
Where it stands as of November 2026: the core standards are finished (OpenID4VCI 1.0, OpenID4VP 1.0 and HAIP 1.0 are Final, W3C VC 2.0 is a Recommendation, SD-JWT is RFC 9901), and EU member states must offer a digital identity wallet by the end of 2026. Decentralized identity is production-ready for government ID, mobile driver's licenses and reusable KYC; it is not a replacement for enterprise SSO.
This is a shift away from the federated model most workforce and consumer login runs on today, where an identity provider authenticates you and vouches for you to each application.
The three roles: issuer, holder, verifier
Every decentralized identity interaction has the same three parties, known as the trust triangle:
- Issuer signs and gives out a credential (a university issues a degree, a government issues an ID, an employer issues a proof of employment).
- Holder stores the credential in a wallet and decides when and to whom to present it.
- Verifier receives a presentation and checks the signature, the issuer, and the status, without needing to call the issuer in real time.
Because the credential is cryptographically signed, the verifier trusts the math and the issuer's public key rather than a live connection to the issuer. See issuer, holder, verifier for the model in detail.
The building blocks and their status
| Layer | Standard | Status, November 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Credential data model | W3C Verifiable Credentials Data Model 2.0 | W3C Recommendation, 15 May 2025 |
| Selective disclosure format | SD-JWT (RFC 9901) and SD-JWT VC | RFC 9901 published; SD-JWT VC in IESG evaluation |
| Mobile ID format | ISO/IEC 18013-5 mdoc | Published 2021; revision in progress |
| Identifiers | W3C DID Core | 1.0 Recommendation since 2022; 1.1 Candidate Recommendation |
| Issuance | OpenID4VCI 1.0 | Final, 16 September 2025 |
| Presentation | OpenID4VP 1.0 | Final, 9 July 2025 |
| Interoperability profile | HAIP 1.0 | Final, 24 December 2025 |
Each row links to a standards page with the primary sources. In short: Decentralized Identifiers are identifiers the subject controls, resolvable to a DID document of public keys. Verifiable Credentials are tamper-evident signed claims. OpenID for Verifiable Credentials moves credentials between issuers, wallets and verifiers over OAuth 2.0, and HAIP narrows it to one interoperable set of choices: SD-JWT VC or mdoc, ES256 signatures and DCQL queries.
One practical consequence: the two largest deployments, the EU wallet and US mobile driver's licenses, anchor trust in X.509 certificate chains and trusted lists, not DIDs. If you need EU interoperability, plan for X.509 alongside DIDs.
Privacy: selective disclosure and zero-knowledge proofs
Holders can reveal the minimum needed. With selective disclosure and SD-JWT, the issuer signs digests of each claim and the holder reveals only the claims a verifier asks for, so you can prove you are over 18 without showing your birth date. Zero-knowledge proofs and BBS signatures go further and make repeated presentations unlinkable; the W3C BBS cryptosuite is still a Candidate Recommendation. The EU framework handles unlinkability differently, by issuing batches of single-use credentials.
Is decentralized identity blockchain-based?
Not necessarily. "Blockchain-based identity" is one branch of the field, not its definition.
- Ledger-anchored: Hyperledger Indy runs a ledger for DIDs and pioneered AnonCreds zero-knowledge credentials. Dock anchors credentials to a blockchain and in 2025 merged its token and network into cheqd. cheqd adds payment rails and trust registries on its network. Privado ID (formerly Polygon ID) and Civic serve Web3 and on-chain apps.
- Ledger-free:
did:webuses ordinary domains and TLS, and the EUDI Wallet and mDL use certificate chains. DID methods compared covers the trade-offs.
For regulated enterprise buyers, a token or ledger dependency is a procurement question in its own right; most production deployments in 2026 do not need one.
Where it is being used
- Government and cross-border ID: under eIDAS 2.0 (Regulation (EU) 2024/1183), every member state must offer an EUDI Wallet by the end of 2026, and public authorities must accept it. The technical framework is the Architecture and Reference Framework, at v3.0.0 since 23 July 2026. Regulated private relying parties such as banks must accept the wallet on user request within 36 months of the December 2024 implementing acts.
- Mobile driver's licenses: mDLs (ISO/IEC 18013-5) are issued by individual US states, and Google's developer documentation says Google Wallet accepts mdoc IDs online over OpenID4VP 1.0. See digital IDs by country.
- Reusable identity verification and KYC: verify once, reuse the credential, instead of repeating document checks. See reusable identity and KYC and the identity verification market.
- Workforce: Microsoft Entra Verified ID made Entra account recovery with Verified ID generally available in May 2026, replacing helpdesk identity checks with a credential presentation.
Decentralized vs federated identity
| Federated (SAML, OIDC) | Decentralized | |
|---|---|---|
| Who vouches at login | The IdP, live, every time | The issuer, once, by signing a credential |
| Runtime dependency | IdP must be up | Verifier needs the issuer's key and status list, not the issuer |
| Privacy | IdP sees every sign-in | Issuer does not learn where the credential is used |
| Maturity | Mature, universal for SSO | Standards final 2025; wallet adoption in progress |
| Best for | Workforce SSO, app login | Proving attributes across organizations |
The two will coexist: expect identity fabrics to bridge federated and decentralized credentials. See decentralized vs federated identity.
Where to start
Read what is self-sovereign identity for the philosophy and history and decentralized identity explained for formats, trust and a pilot plan. Compare tools in top decentralized identity platforms and the decentralized identity vendor directory. When you are ready to choose, see best decentralized identity platforms, decentralized identity for enterprises or decentralized identity for KYC.
Frequently asked questions
- What is decentralized identity?
- Decentralized identity is a model where people and organizations hold their own cryptographically signed credentials in a digital wallet and present them directly to whoever needs to verify them, without a central identity provider brokering every login. It is built on W3C Verifiable Credentials, Decentralized Identifiers and the OpenID4VC protocols.
- How is decentralized identity different from federated identity?
- In federated identity a central provider such as an IdP authenticates you and vouches for you to each service at login time. In decentralized identity you hold signed credentials yourself and present them, so the verifier can check them without calling the issuer.
- Is decentralized identity the same as blockchain-based identity?
- No. Some DID methods and platforms, such as Dock, cheqd, Hyperledger Indy and Privado ID, anchor identifiers or registries to a ledger, but the core W3C standards do not require one. The EU Digital Identity Wallet and mobile driver's licenses use X.509 certificate chains and SD-JWT VC or ISO mdoc credentials, with no blockchain.
- What are the main standards behind decentralized identity in 2026?
- W3C Verifiable Credentials Data Model 2.0 (a Recommendation since 15 May 2025), W3C DID Core 1.0, IETF SD-JWT (RFC 9901), ISO/IEC 18013-5 mdoc, and the OpenID Foundation's OpenID4VCI 1.0 and OpenID4VP 1.0 (Final in 2025) profiled by HAIP 1.0 (Final 24 December 2025).
- When will the EU Digital Identity Wallet be available?
- Each EU member state must offer at least one EUDI Wallet by the end of 2026, 24 months after the first implementing acts entered into force in December 2024. Regulated private relying parties such as banks must accept it on user request within 36 months of those acts.
- What are the leading decentralized identity solutions?
- As of November 2026, our ranking puts Microsoft Entra Verified ID first for Entra-based enterprises, Spruce ID and walt.id for open standards-first stacks, Dock for reusable KYC, and Trinsic for accepting existing digital IDs through one API. MATTR is a strong independent choice for government-grade credential infrastructure.
Related on Start with Identity
- GuideAuthentication vs Authorization (AuthN vs AuthZ) Explained
The difference between authentication and authorization is the question each answers: **authentication (authn) verifies who you are, and authorization (authz) d
- GuideOAuth vs OIDC: The Difference and How the OIDC Flow Works
**OAuth 2.0 vs OIDC comes down to one question: access or identity.** OAuth 2.0 is an authorization framework that gives an application delegated access to an A
- GuideRBAC vs ABAC vs ReBAC: Which Access Control Model to Use
**RBAC vs ABAC vs ReBAC: RBAC grants access through roles, ABAC evaluates attributes of the user, resource and context, and ReBAC derives access from relationsh
- ExpertCo-editor, W3C Decentralized Identifiers 1.0
Drummond Reed co-edited the W3C Decentralized Identifiers 1.0 specification, co-chaired the Sovrin Governance Framework working group for five years, and sits o
- ExpertDecentralized Identity Advocate and Co-founder, IIW
Kaliya Young, known widely as Identity Woman, is a central figure in decentralized identity. She co-founded the [Internet Identity Workshop (IIW)](/conferences/
- ArticleDecentralized Identity for Enterprises: A 2026 Adoption Guide
How enterprises should approach decentralized identity in 2026: where it fits alongside existing IAM, the concrete use cases, a phased adoption path, and the go