Zilla Security
Capability scores
Methodology →- Authentication
- 3.0
- SSO & Federation
- 3.0
- Authorization
- 4.0
- Lifecycle & Provisioning
- 4.0
- MFA & Passwordless
- 2.5
- Governance & Audit
- 4.5
- Developer Experience
- 3.5
- Deployment Flexibility
- 3.5
- Pricing Transparency
- 3.0
- Support & Ecosystem
- 3.5
Scored 0–5 against a published rubric. Independent analysis, no vendor sponsorship.
Overview
Zilla Security delivers cloud-native identity governance (IGA) and provisioning with automated access reviews. Founded in 2019, it built a reputation for fast deployment and low-friction certifications. CyberArk acquired Zilla in February 2025, reportedly for 165 million dollars plus an earn-out, to add modern IGA to its identity security platform. Palo Alto Networks retired the CyberArk brand on 12 May 2026, relaunching the portfolio as Idira, with customer-visible changes from 31 May. Zilla's trajectory now runs through Palo Alto Networks: zillasecurity.com redirects to Palo Alto's Idira Identity Governance page, which sells the product as Idira Identity Governance (Idira IGA) and does not mention Zilla by name (checked 2026-11-05).
What it is good at
Speed is the theme. Zilla automatically collects entitlements across cloud and SaaS applications, builds a clear picture of who has access to what, and turns certifications into a low-friction, largely automated process, a sharp contrast to the slow rollouts of legacy IGA. The modern, API-driven approach makes it quick to stand up and easy for reviewers, which is why it gained traction before the acquisition.
Where it falls short
The CyberArk acquisition reshapes the decision. Zilla's roadmap is converging with the Idira platform (formerly CyberArk), so it is increasingly attractive to existing CyberArk customers and less so to buyers wanting a fully independent vendor. Legacy on-premises connector depth is lighter than the incumbent suites, and authentication and MFA are out of scope.
Pricing
Subscription, increasingly sold within the Idira platform. Compare with standalone IGA using the TCO calculator.
Best for, and who should look elsewhere
Choose Zilla if you are on or moving to Idira (formerly CyberArk) and want modern governance and fast certifications. For independent enterprise suites, see SailPoint vs Saviynt; for other modern options, see ConductorOne vs Lumos.
Bottom line
A modern, fast-to-deploy governance layer with strong automated certifications, now most attractive to organizations on or moving to Idira (formerly CyberArk).
More IGA vendors
All IGA →- SailPoint4.6/5
- Saviynt4.4/5
- Omada4.2/5
- Veza4.2/5
- C1 (formerly ConductorOne)4.1/5
Related on Start with Identity
- VendorBravura Security
niche
- VendorC1 (formerly ConductorOne)
strong
- VendorClear Skye
strong
- Comparisonomada-vs-saviynt
Omada sells a fixed-scope, 12-week IGA rollout with European data residency; Saviynt sells a broader converged platform with ERP-grade separation of duties and
- Comparisonveza-vs-sailpoint
SailPoint is the IGA program of record for provisioning, access requests, certifications and separation of duties. Veza answers who can actually reach which dat
- Comparisonzluri-vs-lumos
Zluri came to governance from SaaS management, Lumos from self-service access requests. They tie at 4.0 overall, and both now claim coverage of AI agent identit
By SWI Community Team · Last evaluated 2026-11-05
Independent, community-driven analysis. No vendor sponsorship. Compiled from public research and community input and verified on a best-effort basis, so details may be incomplete or out of date. Scores are opinions, not advice. Trademarks belong to their owners; mention does not imply affiliation or endorsement. See the full disclaimer, or send corrections to community@startwithidentity.com.